The life of a modern left-handed democrat.
Part 11 of My Presidential Review Series
Published on April 2, 2005 By NJforever In History


First of all, sorry for the delay, I've been busy. Anyway, now is James Knox Polk. Polk is the most expansionist president we ever had. He acquired almost the entire West and some of the Midwest. He is also the first nominee to be nominated unexpectedly, which is known as a dark horse candidate. He was also the first president to only run once. He served March 4, 1845 to March 3, 1849.

Both Great Britain and the U.S. had a claim on the Oregon Territory. At first, Polk would settle for nothing less than the whole territory. The Democrats' cry was "49 50 or fight!" But eventually, he agreed to the compromise that fixed the boundary at the 49th parallel, granting the U.S. the present-day states of Washington and Oregon. Vancouver Island, including the part below the 49th parallel, was granted to Britain.

Manifest Destiny had swept the nation by the time Polk took office, and he wholeheartedly supported the concept. The Texas Annexation worsened relations with Mexico, and the border remained in dispute. The U.S. claimed the border at the Rio Grande, but the Mexicans fixed it at the Nueces River. Polk sent John Slidell to end the dispute peaceably by offering compensation to the Mexican government for acceptance of the Rio Grande border, and to attempt to purchase New Mexico and California. When the Mexicans refused, Polk prepared for war. He ordered American forces under Zachary Taylor to the disputed area.

In April 1846, Mexican forces engaged Taylor's forces in the disputed region. Polk used this as an act of aggression when he asked Congress for a declaration of war. Congress voted to declare war two days later by a vote of 174-14 in the house and 40-2 in the Senate. Democrats completely supported the war, but Whigs were divided. Northern "Conscience" Whigs denounced it as an act of U.S. aggression. Southern and Western "Cotton" Whigs supported the war. The Wilmot Proviso, which barred slavery from all territory acquired from the war, was passed in the House twice and defeated in the Senate twice.

Although the Mexicans had numerical superiority and fought on familiar territory, the Americans used more sophisticated artillery and superior military skills to win the war. Taylor pressed south, defeating the Mexicans at Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma in May 1846 and captured the stronghold of Monterrey in September. In February 1847 he defeated Mexican forces under Santa Anna at Buena Vista. American forces led by Winfield Scott took Veracruz in March 1847, routed Santa Anna at Cerro Gordo in April, and occupied Mexico City in September. Meanwhile, to the north, Commodore John D. Sloat seized Monterey and San Francisco. Troops under Stephen W. Kearney had captured Santa Fe and marched towards California. There with naval forces under Commodore Robert F. Stockton and aided by an American insurrection against Mexican rule, Kearney crushed the Mexicans. With the victory at San Gabriel in January 1847, California fell into American hands.

The war was ended under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Under its terms, the border between Mexico and America was fixed at the Rio Grande; Mexicans residing in the ceded territory were free to remain or to move to Mexico without loss of any real or personal property; the U.S. was to pay Mexico $15 million for the ceded territory; America assumed all claims lodged against Mexico by American citizens, an estimated $3 million. Nicholas P. Trist negotiated the treaty for the United States after Polk ordered his recall, but Polk still accepted its terms. It was ratified in the Senate 38-14 in March 1848, and took effect in July.

The U.S. acquired more than 500,000 square miles in the Southwest, the largest single annexation since the Louisiana Purchase. Mexico was reduced to half of its size. Resentment of the United States for what it regarded as a blatant land seizure still lingers in Mexico. In the U.S., whether or not to allow slavery in the territories became national debate.

An advocate of free trade, Polk signed into law a significant reduction in the tariff rates drawn up by Secretary of the Treasury Robert J. Walker. The law instituted the practice of storing imported goods in warehouses pending payment of duties.

Polk supported the Independent Treasury Act of 1846, which restored the system of independent subtreasuries created by Martin Van Buren in 1840 and repealed in 1841. It required that all federal funds be deposited in treasuries independent of private banks and that all debts due to the government be paid in gold or silver coin or in federal Treasury notes.

Polk died on June 15, 1849, just 3 months after he left office.

I have always considered Polk's method of starting the war U.S. aggression, not Mexican. But what is done is done. He acquired much of the West, and all in all, it wasn't that bad a deal for Mexico: in reality, they lost little of their population, and Polk resisted cries to annex all of Mexico. Despite resentment and cries of aggression, Polk will be remembered as a nearly great president.

Overall Ranking: 8

"Public Opinion: May it always perform one of its appropriate offices, by teaching the public functionaries of the State and of the Federal Government, that neither shall assume the exercise of powers entrusted by the Constitution to the other."

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 02, 2005

vote of 174-14 in the house and 40-2 in the Senate. Democrats completely supported the war, but Whigs were divided.

Divided?  All 4 of them?  Just kidding.

I place him in the top 10 as well, perhaps a little higher.  But Nearly Great?   I guess one termers are that.  Still, you missed (or did not state) the nuance of his term.  We went from being an also ran, to a run after me nation.  In that I mean, for the first time, we really defeated a soverign nation in a real war. 

The kernal that popped into the 20th century America. 

Rank of the articles:  About a 5.  Still great tho!  I did miss them.  But I guess we cant get a Frank Herbert Dune Book every year!

on Apr 02, 2005
Divided? All 4 of them? Just kidding.


Yeah, I guess there wasn't many "Conscience" Whigs.

I place him in the top 10 as well, perhaps a little higher. But Nearly Great? I guess one termers are that. Still, you missed (or did not state) the nuance of his term. We went from being an also ran, to a run after me nation. In that I mean, for the first time, we really defeated a soverign nation in a real war.


I supppose. It's blurred a little bit by how the war started, in my opinion. Nearly great, yes. Great, I generally think of the top 6. If you extend that a little, he was a great president. If my ranking is to be believed, he was the greatest 1-term president we ever had.

Rank of the articles: About a 5. Still great tho! I did miss them. But I guess we cant get a Frank Herbert Dune Book every year!


A 5 out of what? Still great is good. Next up is another died in office. But don't worry, since he actually did stuff, he will be ranked.
on Apr 02, 2005

I supppose. It's blurred a little bit by how the war started, in my opinion. Nearly great, yes. Great, I generally think of the top 6. If you extend that a little, he was a great president. If my ranking is to be believed, he was the greatest 1-term president we ever had.

Hmmm, yes we do have to be selective.  point NJ (dont compromise just because I am a loose person!).

But the Greatest one term?  Damn, I have never thought of singulars before!  Now I have a whole new realm to ideate upon!

A 5 out of what? Still great is good. Next up is another died in office. But don't worry, since he actually did stuff, he will be ranked.

Out of 42 of course!  I have to reserve the best for the last (so I can reorder them). But, hmmmm,

ok, relative to the others, this is Number 2.  So you know it may go down, ok?

Damn you have an addictive series!

And thank you for your thoughts on Pope John II. 

on Apr 02, 2005
Out of 42 of course! I have to reserve the best for the last (so I can reorder them). But, hmmmm,
ok, relative to the others, this is Number 2. So you know it may go down, ok?
Damn you have an addictive series!
And thank you for your thoughts on Pope John II.


Actually, my rankings are going out of 40(Harrison and Garfield will not be ranked, and Cleveland counts twice but is ranked once). Number 2? You really must've liked it! If it wasn't addictive, how else could I have gotten you to read all 11 of them so far? Of course I would put in my thoughts; he was my pope too, you know.
on Apr 03, 2005

Actually, my rankings are going out of 40(Harrison and Garfield will not be ranked, and Cleveland counts twice but is ranked once). Number 2? You really must've liked it! If it wasn't addictive, how else could I have gotten you to read all 11 of them so far? Of course I would put in my thoughts; he was my pope too, you know.

How long did Garfield serve?  I dont remember, but I will wait for your blog on him (I could google it, but that destroys the fun).  Out of 40?  YOu could always make them 21 and 22.  you know, dead center?

on Apr 03, 2005
Out of 40? YOu could always make them 21 and 22. you know, dead center?


Technically, that wouldn't work. I would have to place them between those who did good things and those who hurt America, which is really more early or mid 30's.
on Apr 03, 2005
So-called leaders cannot be 'great,' or 'near great'. So-called leaders merely ride the tide of history; history is a course determined by impersonal processes, independent of any one man's imprint, doing; historians have a bad habit of romanticizing history by slapping faces on historical periods, and proclaiming the Reagan era, etc.; sure this satisfies a psychological desire for control over one’s environment; fortunately those of us on the left are intelligent enough to understand the psychology at work here, and do not fall victim to the historical fairy tales that great white Anglo -Saxon males created civilization; the course of history is determined by the collective, and not individual will. Among other things, the collective will is constrained by environment, technology, etc. In sum. it takes a village to determine the course of events; No single man can be great.


on Apr 03, 2005
So-called leaders cannot be 'great,' or 'near great'. So-called leaders merely ride the tide of history; history is a course determined by impersonal processes, independent of any one man's imprint, doing; historians have a bad habit of romanticizing history by slapping faces on historical periods, and proclaiming the Reagan era, etc.; sure this satisfies a psychological desire for control over one’s environment; fortunately those of us on the left are intelligent enough to understand the psychology at work here, and do not fall victim to the historical fairy tales that great white Anglo -Saxon males created civilization; the course of history is determined by the collective, and not individual will. Among other things, the collective will is constrained by environment, technology, etc. In sum. it takes a village to determine the course of events; No single man can be great.


Ummm.....where to start? First of all, I am on the left, though moderately so, so saying 'those of us on the left' would entail me as well. Also, presidents are put in power BECAUSE of the will of the people(except Ford ), and therefore their will is often the collective will of the nation.
on Apr 03, 2005

Technically, that wouldn't work. I would have to place them between those who did good things and those who hurt America, which is really more early or mid 30's.

I see your optimism!  Ok, then out of 40!

on Apr 03, 2005

In sum. it takes a village to determine the course of events; No single man can be great.

And to raise a village idiot.  Guess a village raised you.

on Apr 04, 2005
I agree with your rating. Without the west and midwest, where would our country be now?
on Apr 04, 2005
And, Dr. Guy, what font do you use for your comments? I've been trying to get it for a while now, and I just can't! Please tell me. I hate the fonts I have to use.
on Apr 04, 2005
I agree with your rating. Without the west and midwest, where would our country be now?


You know what they said:

"Go west, young man, and grow up with the country."
on Apr 05, 2005

And, Dr. Guy, what font do you use for your comments? I've been trying to get it for a while now, and I just can't! Please tell me. I hate the fonts I have to use.

Verdana 10 pt.  It is the default for me, and I just leave it.

on Apr 05, 2005
Thank you very much. When I do Verdana, my font is extremely strange looking, though. It's much larger than yours.
2 Pages1 2