The life of a modern left-handed democrat.
Part 6 of My Presidential Review Series
Published on March 18, 2005 By NJforever In History


Starting earlier than usual, it is time for John Quincy Adams. Adams was technically elected under no party, because the destruction of the Federalists also meant the dismantling of the Democrat-Republicans. However, his election marked the rebirth of the two-party system, as charges that he and Henry Clay struck a corrupt bargain to win the presidency coalesced around Andrew Jackson and formed the Democratic party. He was the only president to be elected without a majority of the electoral vote, and the first son of a president to become president. He was denied reelection by Andrew Jackson. Quincy Adams served March 4, 1825 to March 3, 1829.

Q. Adams was the first president to both completely endorse internal improvements and not question their constituitonality. He believed that the first objective of the federal government was to improve the nation. He proposed construction of a network of roads and canals, a national university, and an astronomical observatory. The plan, however, was too ambitious for Congess, and only extension of the Cumberland Road to Ohio and construction of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal was passed. At the canal's groundbreaking ceremony, Q. Adams turned over the first shovelful of earth.

Q. Adams supported U.S. involvement in the Panama Congress, which convened to foster Pan-American cooperation. Southerners, who feared that it would be used to discuss anti-slavery sentiment, teamed up with Q. Adams' enemies to delay confirmation of the U.S. delegates long enough to make it impossible for them to get there in time.

Q. Adams supported a high tariff on manufactured goods to protect domestic industry, which was centered in New England. It is commonly believed that his enemies attached a high tariff on raw materials, which was important to industry. They hoped it would make the tariff unacceptable to both the North and South, but New England supported it without reservation. The Tariff of 1828, or the Tariff of Abominations, became law. Although its steep rates were rolled back, it upset the South so much it created the nullification crisis in South Carolina during Jackson's presidency.

John Quincy Adams did little during his presidency. Although the tariff on raw materials was not his idea, the Tariff of Abominations was still an awful idea on paper and in practice. I will give him credit, though, for supporting internal inprovements so steadfastly, and for attempting to take part in the Panama Congress. I can't say I've ever really liked him though, due to my vehement support of Andrew Jackson.

Overall Ranking: 32

"Individual liberty is individual power, and as a power of the community is a mass compounded of individual powers, the nation which enjoys the most freedom must necessarily be in proportion to its numbers the most powerful nation."

Comments
on Mar 18, 2005
The title may seem a bit weird, but I couldn't work it into the article. There are some strange similarities between John Quincy Adams and George W. Bush.

Both have the same first name as their former president father, and as such use their middle names as well.

Both have been accused of stealing an election.

I don't particularly like either one.
on Mar 18, 2005
For a president that accomplished so little, how can you possibly rank him so high? The only good thing he really did was representing the slaves of the Amistad before the Supreme Court, and that wasn't even during his term!
on Mar 18, 2005
For a president that accomplished so little, how can you possibly rank him so high?


The real question is, for a president I LIKE so little, how could I possibly rank him so high?

Hmm, outside influence? I think I shall revise it.
on Mar 18, 2005
The title may seem a bit weird, but I couldn't work it into the article. There are some strange similarities between John Quincy Adams and George W. Bush.

Both have the same first name as their former president father, and as such use their middle names as well.

Both have been accused of stealing an election.

I don't particularly like either one.


Since it won't let me edit,(grr!) I'll just add my other finding here.

Both of their Vice Presidents was somebody else's Secretary of War/Defense.
on Mar 21, 2005

Since it won't let me edit,(grr!) I'll just add my other finding here.

I have that problems at times, but can usually find a way to finally allow me to get to the edit button.

On the Q issue, I have often remarked on the similarities between the Bushes and the Adams.  I fully expected W to lose in 04 for that reason.

But I think your dislike of him caused you to rank him higher than you probably should (bending over backwards to not appear prejudiced against him).  I can think of some worse ones (Harding and Grant come to mind), but not 11.

on Mar 21, 2005
But I think your dislike of him caused you to rank him higher than you probably should (bending over backwards to not appear prejudiced against him). I can think of some worse ones (Harding and Grant come to mind), but not 11.


Hmm. Maybe you're right. Harding and Grant were most definetly worse than Adams, but maybe I put him too high. I might reconsider Adams' place in history.