The life of a modern left-handed democrat.
Part 19 of My Presidential Review Series
Published on May 5, 2005 By NJforever In History


Moving on quicker than usual, I write of Rutherford B. Hayes. Rutherford is the longest first name of any president. His was the closest election in the history of this country. Hayes was the first of the presidents to begin to win back power to the Executive Office taken by Congress in the Johnson years. He was the second president to make a campaign pledge to serve only once. He served March 4, 1877 to March 3, 1881.

As I said before, Hayes' election was the closest in U.S. history. His opponent, Samuel J. Tilden, was thought to have won both before and after the votes were cast. With 185 needed to win, Tilden led 184-166 with South Carolina, Louisiana, Florida, and one Oregon electoral vote in dispute. Hayes was ahead in South Carolina, but Tilden was winning in Louisiana and Florida until Republican officials declared many Democratic ballots invalid. Congress established a 15-man electoral commission made of five senators (three Republican and two Democrat), five representatives (three Democrat and two Republican), and five Supreme Court justices (two appointed by Democrats, 2 appointed by Republicans); the fifth justice was picked by the other 4, a Republican appointee heralded for his independence. In February 1877 the commission awarded all electoral votes to Hayes by a vote of 8-7 strictly along party lines. Some southerners threatened rebellion rather than accept what they considered rank usurpation, but Tilden restrained his followers and conceded the election. Hayes further mollified the South with the Compromise of 1877, by which he agreed to recall all troops from the South, begin true reconstruction of the Southern infrastructure, and appoint at least one southern Democrat to his Cabinet.

As promised in the Compromise of 1877, Hayes recalled all troops from the South, at which point white supremacy was restored and the Southern states went solidly Democratic, and would remain so for 100 years.

The Bland-Allison Act, sponsored by Democratic Representative Richard Bland and Republican Senator William B. Allison, was passed over Hayes' veto to become law in 1878. It was a "soft money" measure that required the federal government to buy $2-4 million worth of silver for coinage. It was intended to inflate currency and as such aid farmers, debtors, and silver miners. It was superseded by the Sherman Silver Purchase Act.

Hayes eagerly enforced the Resumption of Specie Act passed by Grant. Treasury Secretary Sherman was instructed to redeem all greenbacks tendered after January 1, 1879 in gold. Denounced by Western soft-money advocates, it nonetheless increased public confidence in American currency.

In June 1877 Hayes issued an executive order barring federal employees from taking part in political activities. He called for comprehensive civil service reform and funding of a civil service commission many times, but Congress failed to act. He favored competitive examinations conducted in the Interior Department and Post Office.

The Chinese had been emigrating to the American West Coast, by 1880 constituting 9% of the California population. At first they were welcomed as cheap labor for the railroads, but as the railroad boom waned, Chinese immigrants started looking for jobs and became a threat to the citizens of California. In 1879 Congress passed a bill nullifying the Burlingame treaty, which gave Chinese citizens the right to emigrate to the U.S. Hayes vetoed the measure, not wishing to strain relations with China. He instead authorized Secretary of State Evarts to negotiate a treaty, the Treaty of 1880, restricting but not banning future Chinese immigration. It was superseded by the Chinese Exclusion Act.

At this time, the French were attempting to build a canal across Central America. In a message to Congress in March 1880, Hayes asserted that any canal built there would be under American influence and they would not allow any European power to build it.

Hayes died on January 17, 1893.

Hayes, like so many before and after him, did little in his presidency. Radical Reconstruction was ended, a very good thing, but I don't believe it can really be considered an accomplishment of his presidency. However, his attempts and limited successes at civil service reform started a precedent, which would lead to the mass amounts of reform accomplished by Roosevelt and Wilson. Also, he stood up to Congress, finally starting to regain some power lost to the legislative branch.

Overall Ranking: 22

"I am not liked as a President by the politicians in office, in the press, or in Congress. But I am content to abide the judgement-the sober second thought-of the people."

Comments
on May 06, 2005

In a message to Congress in March 1800

Uh,. shouldn't that be 1880?  Fazz goes for spelling, I am pretty good at typos since I make so many!

Interesting if dull man.  That election truly was a rigged one, and in compromising with the democrats, and pulling the troops out like that, he virtually assured that the KKK and similar groups would start creating Jim Crow laws and lynchings.  Instead of saying that was a good thing, I think it was premature, but then the wascally Republicans would not do the right thing anyway.  So while some would say it was a good thing, I think it was just the end to a giant CF.  And one that the south would pay for, for the next 100 years as well.

Since I dont know anything about this president except the 'troops be gone' and the stolen election, I cant say I would rate him any different.  At least his administration was not wracked with Scandal, but it does not look it did much else either.

And so, I leave with one for the Fazz.  Another excellant article!

on May 06, 2005
Uh,. shouldn't that be 1880? Fazz goes for spelling, I am pretty good at typos since I make so many!


Found and corrected. Thanks, between you and Fazz these articles will never have mistakes.

Interesting if dull man. That election truly was a rigged one, and in compromising with the democrats, and pulling the troops out like that, he virtually assured that the KKK and similar groups would start creating Jim Crow laws and lynchings. Instead of saying that was a good thing, I think it was premature, but then the wascally Republicans would not do the right thing anyway. So while some would say it was a good thing, I think it was just the end to a giant CF. And one that the south would pay for, for the next 100 years as well.


I don't think it was a very premature thing. At this point, the only thing they could hope to accomplish was eradication of the terrorist groups like the KKK, and they would most likely have sprung back up eventually. Southern resentment towards blacks and, as such, violence towards them, was practically assured at this point.

Since I dont know anything about this president except the 'troops be gone' and the stolen election, I cant say I would rate him any different. At least his administration was not wracked with Scandal, but it does not look it did much else either.


He was really an average in his own right. If he hadn't started the snowballs of reform and recovering power, he would have been much lower. And I'm afraid you'll have to weight until 1920 for major scandals again.
on May 06, 2005

And I'm afraid you'll have to weight until 1920 for major scandals again.

Weight?  oops!

But we have plenty of fireworks until then! McKinley, Garfarkle, Cleveland.......now we get to the good stuff!

on May 06, 2005
Weight? oops!


Major oops. If he asks, tell TheFazz it was a special treat for him!

But we have plenty of fireworks until then! McKinley, Garfarkle, Cleveland.......now we get to the good stuff!


Garfield and Arthur until we get to Cleveland...should I divide Cleveland's article into his two different terms separated by Harrison?
on May 06, 2005

Garfield and Arthur until we get to Cleveland...should I divide Cleveland's article into his two different terms separated by Harrison?

I think so.  He is counted as 2 presidents.  So I guess he should at least get 2 rankings.

BTW, I was not giving a progression, just the juicy ones to come!  Arthur was just a night in camelot!

on May 06, 2005
think so. He is counted as 2 presidents. So I guess he should at least get 2 rankings.


I will give him only one rating even if I divide his articles. After all, it's an overall ranking, so I would have to look at his complete effect on America.

BTW, I was not giving a progression, just the juicy ones to come! Arthur was just a night in camelot!


Oh yes, Cleveland does start a line of some rather juicy ones, excepting Harrison, of course.
on May 06, 2005

I will give him only one rating even if I divide his articles. After all, it's an overall ranking, so I would have to look at his complete effect on America.

Well, then I guess it is out of 42.  So as you do seem to have a knack, I will leave the decision to you. (like I got a choice?  Mush!  Mush you sled dog! )

And Harrison is kind of Juicy.  Well, not juicy, but interesting with the Dakotas (2 instead of 1) and the split decision.  Just not a real barn burner administration if you know what I mean.

on May 06, 2005
Well, then I guess it is out of 42. So as you do seem to have a knack, I will leave the decision to you. (like I got a choice? Mush! Mush you sled dog! )


You forget again, it is out of 40. No rank for Harrison or Garfield, and one for Cleveland. You can put your own ranking in the comments, of course....but it will make no difference next to my ultimate authority!
on May 06, 2005

You forget again, it is out of 40. No rank for Harrison or Garfield, and one for Cleveland. You can put your own ranking in the comments, of course....but it will make no difference next to my ultimate authority!

yes Sahib!  I thought you were not going to rank Bush II so that was out of the 40 (my 42).  So I stand corrected.

I still would rank out of 42.  (or 43).  That is how many there were after all, but again, you are da man!

on May 06, 2005
Another excellant article!


My only comment on that is roar. Roar.

Nice catch for the year, Dr. Guy.

If there was any example of a rigged and biased election, this would most definitely be it.
on May 06, 2005
My only comment on that is roar. Roar.


Oh, you and your roars!

If there was any example of a rigged and biased election, this would most definitely be it.


And Tilden didn't even sue. Repeatedly. Until ordered to stop. Not that I'm hinting at anyone.
on May 07, 2005

And Tilden didn't even sue. Repeatedly. Until ordered to stop. Not that I'm hinting at anyone.

Zing!  Ouch!